Lefty MSM stories on moslem terror in the US emphasize that moslem immigrants are not a ,,, ahhh major source of the terror.
“Foreign-born terrorism is a hazard,” Nowrasteh argues, “but it is manageable given the huge economic benefits of immigration and the small costs of terrorism.”
Small cost (presumably number of Americans killed and maimed) huge benefits ... (unquantified).
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/01/trump-immigration-ban-terrorism/514361/
(Six Iranians, six Sudanese, two Somalis, two Iraqis, and one Yemeni have been convicted of attempting or executing terrorist attacks on U.S. soil during that time period, according to Nowrasteh’s research.)
Simultaneously, conservative journals report a different view ,,,,
"Muslims make up only about 2% of the population of America. If they are killing half the victims of terrorism, that means that a Muslim perpetrator is 25 times more likely to kill someone in a terrorist attack than a non-Muslim."
Hows that work?
It's not the immigrant necessarily - but his son, if raised moslem, is highly suspect.
"MI5, whose behavioural science unit performed in-depth case studies on “several hundred individuals known to be involved in, or closely associated with, violent extremist activity,” including jihadist fundraisers and would-be suicide bombers. The conclusion is that Muslim terrorists in the West “are a diverse collection of individuals, fitting no single demographic profile, nor do they all follow a typical pathway to violent extremism.” As in other countries, they tend to be either converts or second-generation, native-born children of legal immigrants."
http://www.dougsaunders.net/2013/04/muslim-immigrants-terrorists-jihad-terrorism/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment: