Everyone has an opinion. Not all opinion holders are qualified on the subject at hand. Here's a great case in point which I find particularly amusing ....
P-8 torpedoes pipeline?
https://www.monkeywerxus.com/blog/the-nord-stream-2-pipeline-sabotage
Eh?
The warhead of a MK54 is less than half the size of the reported explosions ('hundreds of kilograms')
https://omgbulletin.com/world/281863.html
Further considerations.
An antisubmarine torpedo - in either active or passive mode - is not a precision weapon for objects on an ocean floor. An overrun or underrun in depth is very likely. The active seeker is not a precision, high resolution device that can discriminate rocks and trash from a bottomed sub - or a pipeline. For such work to be performed from an aircraft a helo borne AMNS(1) system would be ... never mind, again the warhead is far too small relative to the reports.
A torpedo makes a heck of a, very distinct, racket on the way to its target. With the Swedes about, could have been a compromising element if employed.
So, while the perp is likely correct in a general sense (OBiden administration on behalf of the globalist cabal - not the American people) the analysis supporting this specific means is clearly specious.
One guy gets it - and MSM jumps all over him ...https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/wild-moment-on-bloomberg/
Thanks for the insight.
ReplyDelete