Who is driving?

I spoke with a gentleman who is engaged in building the wonderful 5G infrastructure.  He didn't seem too mindful of the inevitable negative consequences.

 I live in Texas.  We make gasoline here.  And yet, Musk and his electric car factory have moved in.  

 Lot$ of clout.  

 His cars will be dependent on Communist China for lithium and chips.  Old gas cars, not so.

 Think he'll be pressuring the state to support the transition to 'autonomous' cars?

 Think that's all there is to it?

 Think again.  https://sovereignnations.com/2022/01/28/the-great-reset-automobiles-public-occurrences-ep-64/

  It's not that the Davos crowd will abuse the technology once it's here.  They want the technology in order to abuse us.  Imagine how much liberty you will lose when the government, which already reads your email and monitors, at the least, who you call,  can immobilize your car, or chose where it delivers you to.  

 Such abuse is INEVITABLE.

 Consider how technology changed how NSA worked.  They transitioned from collecting on targets (enemy countries and likely terrorists and spys) to collecting EVERYTHING - without warrants - and pretending our privacy was protected because warrants would be required to look into the vast database for your email, phone call, text ...

 Yeah, that worked great.

 Deep state and the Davos megalomaniacs are great at providing justification for the chains they put on us without constitutional authority.  The discussion in the link above includes an explanation of how, in the claimed pursuit of 'safety' and 'sustainability' we will lose our freedom to travel as we wish. 

 Below was an explanation provided to me, by one involved in the transition, of why unconstitutional violation of privacy was justified as necessary, and why we now live in a prison planet of electronic surveillance.   This exchange was in 2013, well before the revelations of how team Trump was placed under unconstitutional, politically motivated, surveillance by Obama's deep state agencies.

 "XXXX, WRT the Verizon issue (not Prism), it is a signal processing problem. Think of terrorist telephonic communications as infinitesimal but very important signals that are nearly certainly buried in a particular mountain of noise (all other telephonic communications). The mission is to find them. To find the signals you need to know as much as possible about the characteristics of BOTH the signals AND the noise in order to understand what distinguishes the one from the other. The more you know about the characteristics of the signals, the better you are able to develop tuned filters to search for them in the noise. The more you know about the characteristics of the noise the better you will be able to suppress it (the noise) to enhance the contrast of the signals and facilitate the search. BOTH of these activities requires access to the full bandwidth. If you can't access the haystack, you can't find the needle. Does this access open the door for possible abuse? Yup, and adequate preventative measures need to be in place to prevent abuse from happening. Are they? I don't know, and there will in any case be differences of opinion on what constitutes "adequate measures." However, unless one is willing to assert that we simply should not be looking for needles in the haystack unless we already know where they are, I don't think what has been going on is an irrational approach to a very difficult problem."

 Such an opinion is wrong.  

We now live with a stolen election, and unbridled abuses of power by FBI, DOJ, even the dammed Post Office,

 And, if we are to ever recover our freedom, it must stop.

UPDATE - 2/4/22 Zero Hedge with another insight on OBiden's marxist Stasi schemes for your car ...

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/governments-kill-switch-your-car-your-freedoms-your-life