They have NO respect for you." S. Bannon
You are surprised they are trying to steal the election???
Oooops!
Update 8 Nov - look at the sad clown.
Update 12/2 Claim of over 1005 in those districts retracted by paper. https://mkecitywire.com/stories/564495243-analysis-seven-milwaukee-wards-report-more-2020-presidential-votes-than-registered-voters-biden-nets-146k-votes-in-city
Meh. At least for a country that is too stupid to use HCQ/Zn immediately on onset, the US is unremarkable.
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality
State of 'medical science' in the UK (and here too unfortunately)?
For an American over 50 it is difficult to understand the contempt younger Americans hold for their seniors. The Chinese Communist Flu (WuFlu) was, with palpable delight, referred to as the 'boomer remover' by many yet to contribute anything of value to the country.
So, how did we get here? The 'global warming', subsequently 'climate change' (because the gradual post ice age warming never measured up to their alarming projections – see below) hoax is one of the great lies that the neo-marxists have used to effectively bend the minds of younger Americans. Generations of our young have been deliberately terrorized and indoctrinated that their parents were destroying the world with through greed and ignorance. These delusional Americans now cling religiously to the technobabble of technocrats and billionaire megalomaniacs for what they believe is their, and the earths, salvation.
Projected (red) temperature rise vs actual (blue)
https://phys.org/news/2015-01-peer-reviewed-pocket-calculator-climate-exposes-errors.html
I recommend to all interested in the climate change crisis hoax to research the videos and publications of the two very best climate scientists, MITs Dick Lindzen (now retired from that institution) https://youtu.be/pwvVephTIHU, and Georgia Techs Judy Curry https://iamamalaysian.com/2019/03/07/judith-curry-its-time-to-be-scientific-about-global-warming/ as as well as Freeman Dyson, who until his death earlier this year, was widely thought of as the smartest man in the world https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmy0tXcNTPs )
The truth must be more widely known and the fact that millions of Americans were intentionally lied to acknowledged.
First, the 'man caused CO2 destroying the world' scenario was the intentional mutation of a theory created by a respected scientist – who never thought there was adequate confirmation to make drastic action by governments.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/10/31/roger-revelle/
And, there NEVER was a 97% consensus on man caused CO2 creating a crisis.
The best deconstruct of the hoax came from one of the worlds top engineers about 10 years ago – still worth a read. http://burtrutan.com/downloads/EngrCritiqueCAGW-v4o3.pdf
And, to that I would add a sense of perspective. The long term temperature record of the earth is best illustrated by the 'Vostok' ice core from Antarctica. This is a record over 400,000 years long. It shows a range of ~ 22 degrees Fahrenheit over that span of time. It also shows temperatures regularly rising and falling, cyclically, over the eons – almost all of which occurring before the SUV, power plant, and jet aircraft. My point being - the temperature variation and timescale relied upon by the crisis hoaxers to promote a sense of crisis is mere background noise in the natural variations documented for earth's temperatures - and that significant fluctuations are clearly not influenced by any activity of man.
Which begs the question. Why have (some) scientists promoted a sense of crisis over a temperature event that is unremarkable, and indistinguishable from natural occurrences in the past?
This is why, in their own words... (to repeat from my July 2 entry)
Maurice Strong, who organized the first U.N. Earth Climate Summit (1992) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil revealed the real goal: “We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse.”
U.S. Senator Timothy Wirth (D-CO), then
representing the Clinton-Gore administration as U.S undersecretary of
state for global issues, addressing the same Rio Climate Summit
audience, agreed: “We have
got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global
warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic policy and environmental policy.”
Deputy
Assistant of State Richard Benedick, who then headed the policy
divisions of the U.S. State Department said:
“A global warming treaty [Kyoto] must be implemented even if
there is no scientific evidence to back the [enhanced] greenhouse
effect.”
Former Canadian Minister of the Environment,
told editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald: “No matter if the
science of global warming is all phony…climate change [provides]
the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the
world.”
Mikhail Gorbachev emphasized
the importance of using climate alarmism to advance socialist
Marxist objectives: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the
international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.”
Stephen Schneider, who authored The Genesis Strategy, a
1976 book warning that global cooling risks posed a threat to
humanity, later changed that view 180 degrees, serving as a lead
author for important parts of three sequential IPCC reports. In a
quotation published in Discover, he said: “On the one
hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method,
on the other hand, we are not just scientists, but human beings as
well. And like most people, we’d like to see the world a better
place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce
the risk of potentially disastrous climatic change. To do that, we
need to get some broad-based support, to capture the public’s
imagination. That, of course, entails getting loads of media
coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified,
dramatic statements, and make little mention of the doubts we might
have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between
being effective and being honest.”
(quotes from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/02/05/in-their-own-words-climate-alarmists-debunk-their-science/#3de92aab68a3)
The
'science' of man caused global warming disasters was ALWAYS specious. And,
recently, some of the hoax perpetrators are beginning to
confess.
https://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2020/6/29/on-behalf-of-environmentalists-i-apologize-for-the-climate-scare
And, as for consensus, take this into account - https://eraoflight.com/2018/01/13/over-31000-scientists-say-global-warming-is-a-hoax/
Today the chief promoters of the 'global warming'/'climate change' hoax are neo-marxist, malthusean megalomaniacs who want less 'useless feeders' to deal with, and the elimination of the informed, intelligent and independent middle class of bible and gun clingers who all too often frustrate their power grab schemes.
If you're interested in them here's some information on who these people are and what they seek to achieve with their hoax.
http://therightswriter.com/2009/02/obamas-biggest-radical/
https://caldronpool.com/you-and-your-family-are-the-problem-according-to-environmentalists/
I kinda' expected this (if you've read this blog from earlier in the year no surprise). A very well informed individual, known to me, advises marxist will be attacking critical infrastructure in the (likely) event Trump wins reelection.
"Intelligence
from credible sources indicate that if the Republicans win the upcoming
election, the radical left will go nuts, possibly attacking the power grid and
redoubling the violence we have seen this year in our cities with Antifa, et. al. "
Guess a number of us senior citizens will be reliving the experiences of our grandfathers during the big one and standing watch at the electrical substations, railways, and pump stations.
Sigh. While I expect we can muster up a host of better armed vets, I'd bet the geezers in the WWII era photo above were much better marksmen.
So, again, freedom ain't free. A lot of up thought we'd paid our way but, as long as the ROE is liberal, and the badges are simultaneously, and VERY SERIOUSLY, 'taking out the trash'. not a terrible burden.
Note - Given the rifle type, picture appears to be ‘Home Guard’ in England, I’m sure the various ‘state guard’ folks here in the states looked every bit as happy.
This folks is simple election fraud.
Hey Judge ... what's your check account number?
Bull Crap!
Paging Justice Barrett ...
I''ll go out on a limb with this one.
One of the individuals I most dislike, as he is an extraordinarily effective agent of destruction, but respect, is Van Jones. He fully described the revolution we are suffering through years ago as a 'top-down, bottom-up, inside-out' marxist effort. If you don't understand this effort it is well worth learning about.
Here's a good discussion of the revolutionary plan.
https://sovereignnations.com/2019/08/21/plan-change-everything-top-down-bottom-up-inside-out/
or
Once understood you still won't like what's been happening, but at least you'll understand it.
As to the man, recall the delight of half of Obama's brain (Valerie Jarrett) when he joined the 'fundamental change' administration.
Subsequently, Van Jones was one of the folks who inadvertently revealed he knew the impeachment was a fraud to Project Veritas (RT provided clip, authentic as I remember it so I used RT anyway) https://youtu.be/4kh3ngzbUeA
So, Van Jones is a very intelligent, dedicated marxist entirely tuned in on events and information within the DNC.
So - what to make of Van Jones saying very positive things about President Trump's contributions to our black citizens - at a time that admission - on the air - is very damaging to the Democrat's campaign?
https://www.theblaze.com/news/van-jones-attacked-praising-trump-twitter-reactions
Why would he say that?
Did he just blurt out the truth, despite it's possible consequences?
Be on watch for more such perverse indicators over the next week.
Unrelated? Mr Wallace doesn't look happy ...
Update 10/26/20 - hmm, maybe Van got an early look at actual voting reports ...
https://davidharrisjr.com/steven/early-vote-counts-contradict-some-swing-state-polls/
later same day - compare Hillary then with today ...
Even before the damming proof from 'the laptop from hell', the case for Trump was, and remains, overwhelming. If you are still undecided listen to a very smart, and centrist, academic explain his support for Trump.
and ... still on the 26th (hmmm, don't think this is about Trump's latest bad hair day ...)
Update 10/27/20 - Remember the 'never trump' poster girl who strutted her way out to moderate a debate and end his campaign?
hmmm ... https://www.theblaze.com/glenn-radio/megyn-kelly-media-credibility Rupert whispering in her ear?
Update 10/31 ... Well son of a b____, guess the 'smart money' that owns CNN has a clue who is going to win now ...
think they'd be doing this if they really expected Biden could win?
Update AM 1 Nov ...
It will be interesting to see how the DNC 'experts' deal with this ...
If you think my distaste for our deep state, uniformed department, is recent, read the linked article from West Point - then the give and take in it's comments section here:
https://mwi.usma.edu/profession-arms-can-take-michael-flynns-example/
